From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two strange messages while building Emacs on MS-Windows Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:55:58 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83mwxpmtp6.fsf@gnu.org> <83fw3hm0nn.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3srdh3d.fsf@gnu.org> <838v96dgyd.fsf@gnu.org> <8338zecu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <83vcc9aa4a.fsf@gnu.org> <83sj7c8fkn.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355266572 14659 80.91.229.3 (11 Dec 2012 22:56:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 11 23:56:25 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TiYkM-0005Jg-R2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:56:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38376 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiYkA-0001fB-8U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:56:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47059) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiYk7-0001eh-S0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:56:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiYk5-0000WT-Eg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:56:03 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:15363) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiYk4-0000WA-4f; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:56:00 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09soXOY/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjEAsOJhIUGA0kiBwFugmQRAOIQppxgViDBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="209649369" Original-Received: from 108-161-115-152.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([108.161.115.152]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 11 Dec 2012 17:55:59 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D7BAE58C73; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:55:58 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:58:33 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155495 Archived-At: >> As expected. So, if compiling the C sources takes 1 min and compiling >> the Lisp files takes 6.5 min, how come the bootstrap takes 15 min? >> What else takes 7.5 min? > I don't know. It seems that a bootstrap is not equivalent to the sum > of the two commands we've measured. Indeed, there are various other things like leim, info, and whatnot. Still 7=BDmin seems like a long time for it. Could it be that when you compiled the files, you used an `emacs' that was dumped from .elc files, whereas when you bootstrap, you compile the files with an `emacs' that was dumped from .el files? Stefan