From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Feature freeze Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:59:03 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87fvpsq4g0.fsf@gmail.com> <83sitsd1y7.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387245566 27171 80.91.229.3 (17 Dec 2013 01:59:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 01:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 17 02:59:31 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VsjwZ-0002en-5D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 02:59:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59308 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VsjwY-0000bS-Im for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:59:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40802) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VsjwP-0000aW-PC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:59:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VsjwI-00057U-DH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:59:21 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:44244) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VsjwA-00056w-MY; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:59:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rBH1x4k4026062; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:59:05 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D392AAE2BE; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:59:03 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83sitsd1y7.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:34:56 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4794=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4794> : inlines <330> : streams <1092008> : uri <1626297> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:166531 Archived-At: >> This "feature freeze exemption" isn't meant to imply "commit any time >> you like". Basically, what it means for me is that if/when they have >> code ready to merge into Emacs, we may accept it even after the freeze, >> as long as there's still enough time before the release. > How is this different from what I might have in my local feature > branch? The code coming in from Org's repository has generally gone through some reasonable beta-testing (and normally, the rest of Emacs doesn't/shouldn't depend on Org's code, so a problem in Org mode shouldn't affect the rest of the release too significantly). Stefan