From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 13:18:56 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20170202202418.GA2505@acm> <20170203161913.GA2250@acm> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486232353 30500 195.159.176.226 (4 Feb 2017 18:19:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 18:19:13 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 04 19:19:06 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ca4vQ-0007Wm-Qd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 19:19:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40496 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ca4vW-00027m-9u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 13:19:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48587) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ca4vQ-00027h-0T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 13:19:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ca4vM-0004tl-TS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 13:19:04 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:60727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ca4vM-0004tP-Nz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 13:19:00 -0500 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id v14IIuCW029585; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 13:18:57 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3E473AE141; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 13:18:56 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20170203161913.GA2250@acm> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Fri, 3 Feb 2017 16:19:13 +0000") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 3 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.1, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV5940=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5940> : inlines <5673> : streams <1731492> : uri <2371364> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211963 Archived-At: > Instead, why don't you criticise comment-cache in a constructive > fashion? Such as by pointing out potential problems it might cause. Don't be disingenous: we've been through that several times already. Stefan