From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 6fdc3fa: Support terminal focus notifications Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2018 19:10:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20180609055212.3056.85949@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20180609055213.B7E0920498@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1528585694 13215 195.159.176.226 (9 Jun 2018 23:08:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 23:08:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: dancol@dancol.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 10 01:08:10 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fRmxt-0003MB-7m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 01:08:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41752 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fRn00-0005xv-7j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2018 19:10:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33979) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fRmzq-0005xb-39 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2018 19:10:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fRmzm-0004qn-T1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2018 19:10:10 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:40964) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fRmzm-0004pa-Nr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2018 19:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id w59NARLH023324; Sat, 9 Jun 2018 19:10:28 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0B5C7655CB; Sat, 9 Jun 2018 19:10:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (dancol@dancol.org's message of "Sat, 9 Jun 2018 08:49:25 -0700") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6304=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6304> : inlines <6687> : streams <1789223> : uri <2655460> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:226153 Archived-At: >> I think this deserves a comment explaining why we don't use the >> pre-existing `focus-in` and `focus-out` events and why we bind our >> events in global-map rather than in special-map (as is done for >> `focus-in/out` events). > I was being consistent with the xterm-paste event. All three events should > go in special-map if that's the right place, shouldn't they? It doesn't > seem to make a difference in this case. BTW, I think it does make a difference: those events wouldn't work on special-map because special-map is not looked up after input-decode-map. So, I think ideally, we'd want to use special-map here, but for technical reasons we can't. Stefan