From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Future release of emacs-26 Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 21:27:06 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871s1ent89.fsf@gmail.com> <87pnovlr5z.fsf@gmail.com> <83k1f3k3rm.fsf@gnu.org> <87y339g9g7.fsf_-_@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="19146"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 15 03:27:55 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hQii2-0004sG-S2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 03:27:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57407 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQii1-0006cN-R3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 21:27:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57819) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQihQ-0006cG-7K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 21:27:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQihP-0006AK-8w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 21:27:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=50482 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQihP-00068r-29 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 21:27:15 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hQihM-0004Eq-D6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 03:27:12 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:mkLUdmDyGy8N6ItWeyij70LfayQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236527 Archived-At: >> > The signature checking has never worked anyway, though. >> Maybe not for you, but it's supposed to work, and AFAIK it works for >> many people. > Oh, sorry. I always assumed this was why package-check-signatures defaulted > to allow-unsigned. No, this setting is to make it easier for the other ELPA archives which (AFAIK) don't sign their packages (and in any case, Emacs doesn't come with the keys for those). > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35739 Thanks, Stefan