From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build: other output Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:30:44 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83a7eo9nsh.fsf@gnu.org> <83h88ot9wa.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="107221"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 18 14:35:57 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hdDLA-000Rh1-66 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:35:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56642 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdDL8-0001ti-2j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:35:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33021) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdDKW-0001sD-MN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:35:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdDKT-0005kG-1l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:35:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=37924 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdDKR-0005f7-5t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:35:11 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hdDKI-000QYg-Ei for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:35:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:CUB0A8RuUOmyjcPsPDBi/VCZBhg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237832 Archived-At: > I'm not quite sure what your objection is here. There are no "desperate > efforts" taken, and the few remaining build warnings under discussion > are no more complicated to handle than the ones already taken care of. > Instead they're mostly pretty trivial. I think beyond the question of whether those things deserve to be silenced in our build, this is also useful to make sure warnings *can* be silenced cleanly when needed, which I think is an important property (since all warnings can be false positives). Stefan