From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 17:27:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <054393f3-3873-ab6e-b325-0eca354d8838@gmx.at> <20200403174757.GA8266@ACM> <20200404104553.GA5329@ACM> <07fe3b69-3ab2-3173-0696-cb17809e2b91@gmx.at> <83blo7v68b.fsf@gnu.org> <1845d7aa-9ae4-3d95-6a30-c7b1d8d8adec@gmx.at> <83a73qt6zs.fsf@gnu.org> <97c4254e-ff43-8402-3645-f713c408c245@gmx.at> <83y2r9syby.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv1xsset.fsf@gnu.org> <5ba98104-7154-972a-743a-9865e10ae3dd@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="52795"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rudalics@gmx.at, rrandresf@gmail.com, acm@muc.de, Eli Zaretskii To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 06 23:28:55 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jLZId-000Dcy-Ar for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 23:28:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38256 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLZIc-0000uf-D7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 17:28:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37769) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLZHz-0000IG-3N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 17:28:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLZHx-0007ZR-P7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 17:28:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:24889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLZHs-0007TW-1W; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 17:28:08 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E1F4D44FD76; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 17:28:06 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 71D5444FD74; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 17:28:05 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1586208485; bh=yJPberkfOEwSvpgnexrpp2pH6JuXfD6loe9oxj1KlY0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=EIbW3dMmybkn2A3+QWq8mycGgyzlzwrhClVXS7gDnXLogqmRydwvd5eBw7KLpbQ2A DrTZaeV8KRffRhVLASvZlhYvscjCmESUaXtUBlraMvbHUS2lLMj6Nbnv9rzshEraVi 1YYyXemyByG22s72YnY75cmkQlY6NL0NQ7bCy+CA2dXyAjl7t/mthbhyWh2XxH8mLd lZRBHtakZ47doZLvp6+DtQt/8Bh1nfYilWIO0RNmuOjqlRWiejhkFSnvDnCDZCcMKZ NZBMndIhK5PfrEjKkM219/f+DIN9Y8z7jG9OQfcfnAh63Q2URgObRl/8GLGfKEcnpM pFEXwswnOLk1A== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.241.114]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF5DD1207BD; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 17:28:04 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Mon, 6 Apr 2020 21:39:29 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246565 Archived-At: >>>>> And in this case, IIUC, jit-lock is part of redisplay. >>>> Yes, it often is when scrolling. >>> So would you agree that short-circuiting and skipping jit-lock while >>> somebody leans on C-v is a good idea? >> It sounds like a trick question, because what I just described says that ^ you (or "is") >> it is what already happens, more or less, and I'm not sure which part of >> the difference you're thinking of. > We do that when fast-but-imprecise-scrolling is on, right? At this point I don't really know "that" refers to. Stefan