From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Deleting old `:version` from defcustoms (was: master b76cdd0: Delete libraries obsolete since 23.1 and 23.2) Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 14:38:33 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20200515175844.18941.61355@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200515175845.997EC20999@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="44885"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Stefan Kangas To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 15 20:39:33 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jZfF6-000BXS-05 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 20:39:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37376 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZfF5-00046l-19 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 14:39:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52800) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZfEG-0003Tx-99 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 14:38:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:23028) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZfED-00037S-RL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 14:38:39 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B1BA2440299; Fri, 15 May 2020 14:38:36 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 25D1D440293; Fri, 15 May 2020 14:38:35 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1589567915; bh=hOwcHNCfEtu2P5EPTch/WQL4ktJ6/BF8X7nNRI/uwSM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=YuXc73NwNqlrcrE9yHgkBgUr7dNovjlTWVn+ZekhYvJMGHQe9gB+EQHubDUe9Ygmf XqqFrlXxkRPVbcSKIvXowAEE/F6TotAw/B4LRaxD/3kvchWvpZjhB7zy/F11t6Vhlf bfyFiWq3SOEtBiez5cVnv0iLvs74qi8ury9mO5KK30048V8DepfFQw7CSdwUpRiISq MizhX9djO8zAcrBHctBzdIFlHPZBeFb5GgySxWDn69t/w+SWHg+5qWw1kj8hpXwqI2 JF1TYtY0nBlz7eXrdFL1uzNxNm0RiKct/RdS4WTctPXQLnzycn0STFED8SlCshwUcO SWSb+OCFLjqRw== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.3.202]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97D141203C7; Fri, 15 May 2020 14:38:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20200515175845.997EC20999@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> (Stefan Kangas's message of "Fri, 15 May 2020 13:58:45 -0400 (EDT)") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/15 10:04:01 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250411 Archived-At: > Delete libraries obsolete since 23.1 and 23.2 Thanks Stefan. I did a quick `grep` to see the functions/vars that were obsoleted in the same time frame, and I saw instead a deluge of :version "23.1" If we consider those thingies old enough to remove their obsolete functions, shouldn't we also remove the corresponding `:version` thingies from `defcustom`s? I see: - 1 defcustom with a :version of 19.29 - >200 defcustoms with a :version of 20.x - a bit less than 200 defcustoms with a :version of 21.x - >400 defcustoms with a :version of 22.x - >200 defcustoms with a :version of 23.x -- Stefan