From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: If undo-only why not a redo-only? Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 14:10:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <389165503.759660.1591638580779.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <389165503.759660.1591638580779@mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="42216"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 08 20:11:59 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jiMFb-000AtC-BY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 20:11:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58242 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jiMFZ-00079o-DP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 14:11:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55196) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jiMEj-0006Xy-AF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 14:11:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:12217) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jiMEh-0005wH-QC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 14:11:04 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CEDBC80B6D; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 14:11:01 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0762C8057E; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 14:11:00 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1591639860; bh=gJVdhShYEPlas1fuxc7wLg4ADdmyRFJSTSzKj5vn2Q8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=kUHEkKpnvW8Fc8G2q7msGuhdB0vdVPbn0JzL/MMcjmbNsI8/SOGHZwAAWWmJR6Lc5 v57a+7MtL8Jk4l5M2N0Eg1JBeBLMDulp43acNocjwZcw2cffLUJQ3Q2lpz7YZuVJfn +Ppa3obrGm4gDdNmXW/4uvvqzDr78w3K1dFcnnr07tmxEwJkH17WHyot5caVqw7jPz TUUbja9XdgFQsOWe8dETgDGWatcd0CNM+Gj+2O4V/yRQhLNNsn7POYJlNpBKTdjYoR bOJc26AixAMEmjt9cxHW0g8mxeXNYP2YcHchqbx2W3C7rx0d12hbpWDZyUFMqzQRh5 uJfsRJcdmGEig== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [157.52.17.179]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 660B51207EB; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 14:10:59 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <389165503.759660.1591638580779@mail.yahoo.com> (Ergus's message of "Mon, 8 Jun 2020 17:49:40 +0000 (UTC)") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/08 14:11:02 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252051 Archived-At: > I've seen that we have an undo-only command and a way to customize > a variable to do so for undo-redo. > Is it too complex to implement the same to do a redo-only equivalent in > order to bind that to a different key if the user wants so? I don't understand what you're asking for. Could you give some examples of what you'd like to see? The current code is designed so you can have a "plain old undo+redo" system by using the commands `undo-only` and `undo-redo`. Stefan