From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...] Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:54:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6360"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , "dgutov@yandex.ru" , "stefankangas@gmail.com" , Lars Ingebrigtsen , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 16 20:55:32 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lC6RY-0001Xa-DX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:55:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44956 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC6RX-0006XH-Fe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:55:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57594) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC6QZ-0005sS-4b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:54:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:19699) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC6QW-0001pQ-B7; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:54:30 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C40D5441257; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:54:26 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 761B7441252; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:54:25 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1613505265; bh=CQqHwLRDNmH4rARBWnNnIigvsmvvl7UBY3qZhj/4Gq8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=SQtrGtq7r80z7wABWmjU04arBJrBAPK05pSNtnfbixSi9m/24dlkPX3S26kjzqIn1 LSJyhDFih1noETVCvPs9HdIaXrupfwnXNtxd1wF2FrKatmYphVyK6oF+0sYpcGWYJ1 mLX6nrZI6pXQR4XP+3UCxNrGDzs4a2GTnqcX4oKmfQix1ouib0ich8+n3hjqP4Jgsd 09sks0CkecjBLdSX0NKY9INleV6MQpeov5708gKeH7CGumj79cViUFNxpUJte9fGrt m+2s1JUsJJ6/dXUFWWT/m8Lp9/jZqFI0r0aS82WMEE45Ae148+aHA2KNpP5cM36+EV erFky4MitX92g== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.41.47]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 270EE1202E9; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:54:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:50:20 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264930 Archived-At: > I couldn't get a response when I asked for > reasons why it was expected that 97% of > commands are mode-specific. (Stefan even > characterized asking for that to be only > a joke.) Drew? Hello? I never said your question was a joke. I said it was cute, because it showed you didn't catch that the 97% figure was a joke. Stefan