From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-fontify-block Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:58:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87a6sbg41o.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfatirk1.fsf@gnus.org> <83blbpmy2x.fsf@gnu.org> <837dmdmw60.fsf@gnu.org> <30f0a4188eac8da31543@heytings.org> <30f0a4188e796ef64509@heytings.org> <496380cc60478547e162@heytings.org> <496380cc6050c3dcb765@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36012"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 15:59:24 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKjG8-0009HQ-AG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:59:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36942 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKjG7-0001qy-Aq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:59:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33564) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKjEy-0000SV-W6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:58:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:39923) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKjEw-0007Ro-Te for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:58:12 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8B82F8099C; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:58:09 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5679B80712; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:58:08 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1615561088; bh=zxMGvvzaxxO/gOpW7mNHOBpZyyhjWXfhwUPpTYGYZiU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=NF5E0zBLVefGKyT1binuy5aqQMGyBNYY5kBEoqLagzgRTqxSjnajPHRJWwCAE2a45 qsDXoz1pA2qdYNfFhRV9LdW8Ay5QsxPUqC6IXRG7WR1zxwIMfjJWUQdvCiISaq2ioJ aeikxIEHZBfF/HqDifMGmgW6vEOAjTQpX7pkPAMiBAHUh5LKN9AMn0ONTtMk4YhtfP Ke2muJuMRZoo4CGEtwoDyZbVxza4dysjVNW6qNF+0kFOlh2N/H8EfAoJ9MgoR8a+Kg xG5f1YyvCvRPYTXR6aOTa7sA35oRCrH+6xVeQIH/B6LA3PxUq0DUz2X4JbhK72BS8V 1Jbi1OfDcZxzg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.43.249]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 254D91203AB; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:58:08 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <496380cc6050c3dcb765@heytings.org> (Gregory Heytings's message of "Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:23:43 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266402 Archived-At: > Thank you. That was my impression, too, but I wasn't 100% sure. > Given this, my updated suggestion is: > > (defun font-lock-update (&optional arg) > (interactive "P") > (save-mark-and-excursion > (if (not arg) > (font-lock-fontify-region (point-min) (point-max)) > (font-lock-unfontify-region (point-min) (point-max)) > (font-lock-mode 'toggle)))) > (global-set-key (kbd "C-x x f") 'font-lock-update) No, if you start with that you will end with what we have. Stefan