From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: feature/package+vc 04c4c578c7 3/4: Allow for packages to be installed directly from VCS Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2022 08:45:09 -0400 Message-ID: References: <164484721900.31751.1453162457552427931@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <878rle1i0k.fsf@posteo.net> <87ilkelc10.fsf@posteo.net> <878rl6syg8.fsf@posteo.net> <87zgdjqcu0.fsf@posteo.net> <87zgdivc3f.fsf@posteo.net> <874jvqv2u3.fsf@posteo.net> <875yg6qtbl.fsf@posteo.net> <83leoubj9p.fsf@gnu.org> <83iljyavgz.fsf@gnu.org> <9549e4e9-de49-435b-e085-539c89a476a3@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8141"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Kangas , rms@gnu.org, philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 02 14:05:43 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oqDR9-0001uZ-93 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 14:05:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqD7b-00060t-Nr; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 08:45:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqD7U-0005zN-Ug for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 08:45:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqD7N-0002vA-Ls; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 08:45:24 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 28AC9808E1; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 08:45:13 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BDE0B807CB; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 08:45:11 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1667393111; bh=JyH01uQb8vkuoGBaRh/MxUEKIb43blyp9PRKnrOsytw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Zkbz9LbDSDszOrOKeE6FoRPUNFufcBUzc/QZsh+cjfinPJwwThLd0HodBxcyR8Lep HORgOq6b3Ij9/E99jX0X4U3Wb7MQ99c2zPeWNpC838jW/cmX+2eDSeudllOPeaFSz4 Ln2o8vHgKomb6U/MP96K7j4ucXoPPlzntntpku9BjF5oD0ANgZ3oClMpEtpHmlB7G/ CZQhVj2GcKSgumYYCTHOtfTFj/Iiw+mScSG7Vdc4665SpKhGfUVjZ6w+S+K8x9loLY 6gUnFiDUDaaluyX7oKopoYlk+r8Sk+Iou1gouY1ThEs3W1vXk06B8rXIGYC59n4E9l 6J0qQM4Slx70w== Original-Received: from pastel (65-110-220-202.cpe.pppoe.ca [65.110.220.202]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BF031204E9; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 08:45:11 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <9549e4e9-de49-435b-e085-539c89a476a3@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Wed, 2 Nov 2022 12:18:03 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:299005 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov [2022-11-02 12:18:03] wrote: > On 02.11.2022 05:25, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Anyway, my point is that our current policy is to try to support all >> the VCSes in VC at the same level. > ...in VC. > I'm not sure we should consider package-vc to be part of VC. Indeed, it's not. It's a package which uses VC, quite different. Stefan