From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: package-initialize was Re: cl-lib warnings Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 19:01:40 -0500 Message-ID: References: <86o7s3lsnx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86bknx8783.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <837cylapt4.fsf@gnu.org> <83wn6kamwr.fsf@gnu.org> <83len0aldq.fsf@gnu.org> <83k02kadbv.fsf@gnu.org> <83a63fap35.fsf@gnu.org> <83bknu8tmo.fsf@gnu.org> <18E95AC5-1FFC-4025-B804-7D70DDB1BD75@gmail.com> <87y1qw2yt4.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20989"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Sean Whitton , =?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU?= =?windows-1252?B?4XZvcmE=?= , Yuan Fu , Eli Zaretskii , Juanma Barranquero , Juri Linkov , emacs-devel To: "T.V Raman" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 26 01:02:42 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p9awz-0005Fp-T1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2022 01:02:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p9awE-0002LA-0O; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 19:01:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p9awA-0002Ky-Ny for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 19:01:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p9aw9-0007dU-4J; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 19:01:50 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2BA438078F; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 19:01:44 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 918AA80234; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 19:01:42 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1672012902; bh=aiSdEsDBliG0FHZwcz9aA5oDyPYd6N2cAVyokY41nc4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=iW3UBOXcPbxGPD/3CQXtqOPOFPnPxxOVQw+0K6wm2adWXTExQbUHZs2pzlg3JtP3U aclgAdqK0kttDv1RtkwLldLRthxUIqV+GTPju3NLpPecxiqxk7sBEYbev4amyavLS1 k/A3RhqoHSnWPgt93wDpGVLG+enbeRChVGxPBwNwj/tyxC5ejDmGu5+xMLYvApYFHW ++Z7FseqSeULsKntOSBOnOai96KK5pEIaLINjfOmU4bJbVvX2QdqJCyg/joh2JOioU x2s60Vns9CvtK1e7YlAc4Ku4Pbxs0mRC7d68wJGGxrLc1JlkQQnM6y/epUIl4q1OlN nwNRtmrO8pTVA== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.200.228]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B45212019B; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 19:01:42 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (T. V. Raman's message of "Sat, 24 Dec 2022 18:39:15 -0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:301916 Archived-At: > So I started noticing my emacspeak build spew out cl is deprecated > warning for all files in emacspeak and found something curious: > > A. Emacspeak does (require 'cl-lib) but that wasn't the source of the > warning. "cl deprecated warnings" have nothing to do with `cl-lib`. They have to do with `cl`. > Why the difference between (B) and (C)? It's probably only tangentially related to the real cause. Stefan