From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it planned to remove xemacs compatibility code? Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:13:59 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098825296 25919 80.91.229.6 (26 Oct 2004 21:14:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:14:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 26 23:14:45 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CMYeT-0005W8-00 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:14:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMYmB-0001Ge-M4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:22:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CMYm4-0001GK-2h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:22:36 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CMYm2-0001Fc-Iz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:22:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMYm2-0001FZ-99 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:22:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CMYdl-00026Q-8b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:14:01 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E458D8282B7; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:14:00 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBF14AC80F; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:13:59 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5180F8CA23; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:13:59 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: CHENG Gao In-Reply-To: (CHENG Gao's message of "Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:26:26 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=0, requis 5) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28996 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28996 > Around Emacs code, I find many Xemacs compatibility code as > (cond ((featurep 'xemacs) blah ...) > (if (featurep 'xemacs) blah ...) BTW, usually such tests are bad and should instead use (fboundp ) or something like that. Stefan