From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gnus makes emacs lose response Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 06:45:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87u035b5ly.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87psdtb503.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1158662777 6797 80.91.229.2 (19 Sep 2006 10:46:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Kim F. Storm" , Leon , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 19 12:46:16 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPd7C-0002U3-5F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:46:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPd7B-0000W6-Bi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 06:46:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GPd6y-0000Ts-Nu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 06:45:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GPd6x-0000P8-2Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 06:45:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPd6w-0000Oh-Ut for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 06:45:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.122.15.118] (helo=alfajor) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GPdA0-0006m9-0P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 06:49:04 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9F2E81C1B9; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 06:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Chong Yidong In-Reply-To: <87psdtb503.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Mon\, 18 Sep 2006 10\:53\:32 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60006 Archived-At: > Stefan, why do you check read_kbd with PROCESSP? Hmm.... beats me! > read_kbd is an > integer (0 in this case), not a process. Shouldn't it be Oh I see, it's because I haven't updated the code in response to the following change: 2004-08-19 Kim F. Storm * process.c (wait_reading_process_input): Clean up. Add wait_for_cell, wait_proc, and just_wait_proc args to avoid overloading `read_kbd' and `do_display' args. Change read_kbd arg to int. All callers changed. So I should probably check wait_proc instead. Stefan