From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: URL not following some 302 redirects after recent changes Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:37:41 -0500 Message-ID: References: <871wnw2opm.fsf@x3y2z1.net> <87tzy7wbsj.fsf@x3y2z1.net> <87bqkek9s7.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170430700 8829 80.91.229.12 (2 Feb 2007 15:38:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 15:38:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , mange@freemail.hu, disumu@x3y2z1.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 02 16:38:07 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HD0UA-0006n8-2r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:37:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HD0U9-0001Ci-MB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:37:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HD0Tx-0001CC-VF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:37:45 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HD0Tv-000198-I8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:37:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HD0Tv-000190-Ct for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:37:43 -0500 Original-Received: from tomts36.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.93] helo=tomts36-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HD0Tu-0001ga-A7; Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:37:42 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([74.13.168.230]) by tomts36-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20070202153741.DGWF1862.tomts36-srv.bellnexxia.net@pastel.home>; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 10:37:41 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4F4D47F57; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 10:37:41 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Fri\, 02 Feb 2007 06\:26\:35 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65772 Archived-At: > Here's one idea. Instead of setting the sentinel temporarily to nil, > set it temporarily to `sentinel-temporarily-inhibited'. That would be > ignored just as nil is ignored. > On restoring the sentinel, if its current value isn't > `sentinel-temporarily-inhibited', just discard the old value instead > of restoring it. Why can't we do the same thing with nil? Stefan