From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org
Subject: Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:35:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwv8xdbx2al.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4610139D.3060909@gnu.org> (Jason Rumney's message of "Sun\, 01 Apr 2007 21\:18\:37 +0100")
>> There's no indication that doing it right (i.e. doing the coding-system
>> decoding somewhere in the w32 code which turns w32 events into elisp events)
>> is difficult. AFAICT nobody has really tried to do it.
> Anything to do with coding-systems in C code is difficult. Especially when
> almost every encoding on Windows involves autoloaded CCL based
> coding-systems.
It doesn't have to be done in C. Since decoding may run elisp code, it has
to be done somewhere where lisp can be run, so you may as well do it by
calling an elisp routine from C. Of course, you have to figure out where to
do it, and make sure that it's indeed a place where lisp can be run.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-01 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-28 22:27 kbd vs read-key-sequence Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-28 22:40 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-02-28 22:50 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-02-28 23:32 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-01 1:35 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-01 5:28 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-01 12:48 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-01 15:32 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-01 17:30 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-01 23:23 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-01 23:53 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-02 0:03 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-02 9:09 ` Jason Rumney
2007-03-02 9:48 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-02 16:47 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-02 17:29 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-02 17:57 ` Jason Rumney
2007-03-02 18:15 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-02 18:20 ` David Kastrup
2007-03-02 21:03 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-03 0:31 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-03 22:13 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-03 23:01 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-05 2:55 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-05 17:10 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-11 20:01 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-12 15:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-13 1:17 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-13 3:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-13 4:06 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-13 14:47 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-19 5:14 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-19 12:25 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-19 14:19 ` Kim F. Storm
2007-03-26 3:52 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-26 7:22 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-26 23:14 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-27 0:30 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-27 16:42 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-28 0:29 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-29 15:32 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-29 16:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-30 21:23 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-31 0:38 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-31 10:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-31 23:20 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-01 3:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-01 13:59 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-01 19:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-01 20:18 ` Jason Rumney
2007-04-01 20:35 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2007-04-02 12:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-02 2:27 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-04-02 11:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-02 12:31 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-04-02 12:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-02 14:33 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-02 16:14 ` Jason Rumney
2007-04-02 23:24 ` Davis Herring
2007-04-03 6:58 ` Jason Rumney
2007-04-03 7:46 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-03 8:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-03 14:58 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-03 15:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-03 17:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-03 18:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-03 18:33 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-04 14:02 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-04 14:02 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-03 9:05 ` Jason Rumney
2007-04-03 9:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-03 10:24 ` Jason Rumney
2007-04-04 14:02 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-03 10:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-04 14:02 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-04 18:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-31 20:42 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-31 21:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-31 22:06 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-30 0:47 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-30 3:25 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-31 10:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-31 20:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-30 21:22 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-31 10:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-19 5:14 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-26 23:14 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-28 0:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-28 16:09 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-28 19:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-29 17:59 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-30 23:47 ` Chong Yidong
2007-03-31 9:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-03 22:13 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-02 18:21 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-02 19:04 ` Jason Rumney
2007-03-03 10:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwv8xdbx2al.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=handa@m17n.org \
--cc=jasonr@gnu.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).