From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: more url-utils? Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 00:04:50 -0300 Message-ID: References: <8739kgqbui.fsf@gnu.org> <871uzy7b9o.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877h9q5ub7.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87y6264f29.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k4dqtoc4.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87liy64cwi.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305601506 16727 80.91.229.12 (17 May 2011 03:05:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 03:05:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 17 05:04:59 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QMAah-0002C1-57 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:04:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41688 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMAag-0002fu-L4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 May 2011 23:04:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39033) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMAad-0002fi-P9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2011 23:04:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMAac-0004Oo-VU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2011 23:04:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:43205) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMAac-0004Ok-U7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2011 23:04:54 -0400 Original-Received: from 213-159-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.159.213]:41138 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMAac-0003FM-9R; Mon, 16 May 2011 23:04:54 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D826D66140; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:04:50 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: <87liy64cwi.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Mon, 16 May 2011 15:18:53 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139456 Archived-At: > Ah, OK. So my proposal does not fit because you want backwards > compatibility. I think that's right, although I'm not completely clear on what is exactly your proposal. > I was hoping to eliminate the bad API altogether but this is at least > a step forward. Let me know if you want me to implement any parts > of this. If you can provide a patch that give us a clean new API together with some backward compatibility layer, that would be great. Stefan