From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: more url-utils? Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 19:17:43 -0300 Message-ID: References: <87fwogaxzb.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87mxilezg8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87boz0eov8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87mxikrulm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871uzw5asv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87boyzcv0o.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k4dnassv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878vu23lpe.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306793876 3908 80.91.229.12 (30 May 2011 22:17:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 22:17:56 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 31 00:17:52 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRAmW-0000Ev-00 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 00:17:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52340 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRAmV-0008Qn-6X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:17:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRAmT-0008Qe-6B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:17:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRAmS-0007w2-C3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:17:49 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:46243) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRAmS-0007vx-AP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:17:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [190.194.233.124] (port=52307 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRAmR-0005Dr-K8; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:17:48 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id CE1C3660D3; Mon, 30 May 2011 19:17:43 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 30 May 2011 21:38:01 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139916 Archived-At: >>> (funcall #'parse-page (url-fetch "http://google.com")) >> [...] >>> (url-fetch "http://google.com" 'parse-page) >> I.e. the callback takes a single argument. > Which would be a list of buffer/info/headers? For example, yes. > Presently the callback is called with the current buffer set to the > return buffer. If the async is to have the same signature as the sync, > then that's not really practical. The sync case can set-buffer as well, so both choices are possible without breaking consistency. I don't have a strong preference either way. Stefan