From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some question about display-buffer action functions Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:32 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4F25829F.8000104@gmx.at> <4F266F3D.6030105@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327961088 23123 80.91.229.3 (30 Jan 2012 22:04:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Emacs developers To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 30 23:04:47 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RrzLC-0006nB-3M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:04:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45418 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrzLB-0008QX-Kn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46791) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrzL5-0008PH-Th for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrzL1-0007ef-Lk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:39 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:60053) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrzL1-0007eM-HY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:35 -0500 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q0UM4W5c016022; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:32 -0500 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5DBDCB4431; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:32 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4F266F3D.6030105@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:21:49 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4117=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4117> : streams <724356> : uri <1056750> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148051 Archived-At: > Actually `bs-cycle-next' should use `pop-to-buffer-same-window'. No, since that could cause it to pop up a new frame, whereas bs-cycle-next is not about "I want to see this buffer" but "I want to change this window's content", so popping up a new frame wouldn't help. Stefan