From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r116878: Sync with upstream vhdl mode v3.35.1 Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:53:37 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20140328135037.Horde.Hkmu2nCKs7FDnFJSl377KA1@webmail.retoweb.net> <20140328204054.Horde.MjY2JcxlETdQ-8TbRiTlWg6@webmail.retoweb.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1396047247 624 80.91.229.3 (28 Mar 2014 22:54:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:54:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Reto Zimmermann Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 28 23:54:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WTffC-0005QX-He for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 23:54:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36249 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTffC-0000bx-66 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:54:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38893) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTff2-0000bo-Jt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:54:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTfev-0004TQ-2S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:54:04 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:33207) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTfef-0004SP-B7; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:53:41 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s2SMrctJ018345; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:53:38 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id EE391603F9; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:53:37 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20140328204054.Horde.MjY2JcxlETdQ-8TbRiTlWg6@webmail.retoweb.net> (Reto Zimmermann's message of "Fri, 28 Mar 2014 20:40:54 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4895=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4895> : inlines <662> : streams <1146774> : uri <1713014> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:171110 Archived-At: > BTW, I was a heavy user of the (now deprecated) assoc package and didn't > find a suitable replacement. (aget alist key t) is just a convoluted way to do (cdr (assoc key alist)) (aget alist key) is probably equivalent to (let ((x (assoc key alist))) (if x (or (cdr x) key))) tho it's a sufficiently strange behavior that I doubt you'll ever need/want it. `aput' is generally advantageously replaced by `push'. Stefan