From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: package.el and emacs-version dependencies Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:09:03 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423609765 25501 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2015 23:09:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:09:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Artur Malabarba , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kelly Dean Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 11 00:09:17 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YLJvg-0002n8-5t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:09:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42359 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLJvf-000368-3z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:09:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34925) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLJvc-000361-Af for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:09:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLJvX-00055n-A4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:09:12 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:34360) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLJvX-00055j-5h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:09:07 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t1AN93gr031979; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:09:04 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B7431FB0; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:09:03 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Kelly Dean's message of "Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:33:34 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV5213=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5213> : inlines <2105> : streams <1388139> : uri <1851788> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:182853 Archived-At: > Maybe indicate incompatible packages and allow hiding them, but show them by > default, to goad people into upgrading their Emacs so they can use all the > great new packages. I agree that completely hiding them is not a good idea. They can be marked specially (including greyed out), but they should appear. Stefan