From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How can I rethrow an error after recording a backtrace? Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:29:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <53ca9864-3a3b-8406-65c9-8458d0512299@gmail.com> <83y44ajjtg.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1470490233 23136 195.159.176.226 (6 Aug 2016 13:30:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:30:33 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: clement.pit@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 06 15:30:29 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bW1gD-0004lu-Q1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 15:30:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49475 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bW1gA-0001XJ-JB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:30:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40083) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bW1fz-0001Uo-4Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bW1fx-0001wJ-QN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:30:06 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:61067) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bW1fr-0001tQ-4o; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:29:59 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A+FgA731xV/2/xd0tcgxCEAoVVwwgBAgQCAoE8PBEBAQEBAQEBgQpBBYNdAQEDAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiDcIzyMBAQEBBgEBAQEeizqFBQeELQEEsz+BRSOEFCKCeAEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0A+FgA731xV/2/xd0tcgxCEAoVVwwgBAgQCAoE8PBEBAQEBAQEBgQpBBYNdAQEDAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiDcIzyMBAQEBBgEBAQEeizqFBQeELQEEsz+BRSOEFCKCeAEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,465,1427774400"; d="scan'208";a="250409741" Original-Received: from 75-119-241-111.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.241.111]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 06 Aug 2016 09:29:56 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 32CDA64D8B; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 09:29:56 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83y44ajjtg.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 06 Aug 2016 13:03:23 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206442 Archived-At: > So maybe we should avoid entering the debugger only if _both_ > variables say we shouldn't. That's what we do currently. Stefan