From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: About the 'minibuffer' frame parameter Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:23:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <579E3F9E.8020200@gmx.at> <83h9azl4s1.fsf@gnu.org> <57A4C0DE.3060506@gmx.at> <837fbvkofs.fsf@gnu.org> <57A5AF03.30807@gmx.at> <8360rck7kd.fsf@gnu.org> <57A84256.8030706@gmx.at> <83popji89w.fsf@gnu.org> <57A9940B.6030005@gmx.at> <8337mehu5u.fsf@gnu.org> <57A9FFDE.10106@gmx.at> <83pophhq1a.fsf@gnu.org> <57AA141C.5010701@gmx.at> <83mvklhluf.fsf@gnu.org> <57AB1AF1.2010205@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1470839946 13498 195.159.176.226 (10 Aug 2016 14:39:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:39:06 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 10 16:39:02 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUer-0003Ht-Oz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:39:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42014 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUeo-0002zz-Mz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:38:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54892) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUQT-0005fW-EL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:24:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUQQ-0005zj-2q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:24:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=46684 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUQP-0005zE-Rq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:24:06 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUQK-0001pk-Fz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:24:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:3SHSy6b3lUeYOVdJ0QQj+wdMo/0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206534 Archived-At: >>> But then we can't discriminate minibuffer-less from normal frames by >>> looking at the parameter value only. >> We can look at what window-frame returns for that window, can't we? > Tediously so, yes. For minibuffer-free frames, we could return the *frame* whose minibuffer we use. Stefan