From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: When should ralloc.c be used? Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 17:47:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87d1itt79z.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <7baa18d4-2b09-caa8-005e-29008a383ad1@cs.ucla.edu> <83mvhwrgd5.fsf@gnu.org> <8539f38f-9a11-44c3-4de7-bb974c96206c@cs.ucla.edu> <83d1iq5ib1.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3753c8j.fsf@gnu.org> <83r374wh32.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpgtrmt2.fsf@gnu.org> <83twbvr78y.fsf@gnu.org> <83vaw9q0gu.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477865599 12153 195.159.176.226 (30 Oct 2016 22:13:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 22:13:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 30 23:13:15 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c0yLb-0000lm-Rh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 23:12:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60300 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0yLe-0003Sf-A5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58289) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0xww-0006yj-Pq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 17:47:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0xww-0003qO-3o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 17:47:30 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:34107) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0xwq-0003po-2y; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 17:47:24 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BiAgALW9BX/+953mhdGwaDMAEBAQEBHoRNhVCvdoIDhhYEAgKBaTkUAQIBAQEBAQEBXieEYgEBAwFWIxALNBIUGA0kiFUIvFUBCyWKfYocAQSZWZEVh3iGC5BLHjaEbCCGCgEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0BiAgALW9BX/+953mhdGwaDMAEBAQEBHoRNhVCvdoIDhhYEAgKBaTkUAQIBAQEBAQEBXieEYgEBAwFWIxALNBIUGA0kiFUIvFUBCyWKfYocAQSZWZEVh3iGC5BLHjaEbCCGCgEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,296,1470715200"; d="scan'208";a="277635760" Original-Received: from 104-222-121-239.cpe.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([104.222.121.239]) by smtp.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 30 Oct 2016 17:47:22 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id CB3FCAE111; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 17:47:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83vaw9q0gu.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:13:21 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208999 Archived-At: >> BTW, how large is that single file (I'm curious if its size is >> significantly different from the 3.2MB I got for my dumped.elc)? > Its size is 4.2MB. It's basically a concatenation of all the > preloaded *.elc files, with all but a single preamble removed. OK, so it's pretty much exactly the same size as what I get (the 3.2MB I get turns into 4.2MB if I print each function/var separately, thus preventing sharing between them, which is what happens in the normal .elc files). Good to know that there's no significant difference between the two in this regard, thanks. Stefan