From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Replace trivial pcase occurrences in the Emacs sources Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:09:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83tvlcsnee.fsf@gnu.org> <86mur137n8.fsf@gmail.com> <20181029130132.GB4195@ACM> <20181029134722.GC4195@ACM> <83r2g8klf9.fsf@gnu.org> <83wopzk3sw.fsf@gnu.org> <83r2g7jrot.fsf@gnu.org> <83k1lzjq0r.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1540922862 19118 195.159.176.226 (30 Oct 2018 18:07:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:07:42 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 30 19:07:38 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gHYQT-0004s5-Ma for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 19:07:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54873 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gHYSZ-0002G5-VQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:09:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37734) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gHYSR-0002Ej-2w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:09:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gHYSH-0000Fx-NE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:09:35 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:56076) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gHYSB-000083-Au; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:09:26 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id w9UI9JNU003228; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:09:19 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E57AF6A47D; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:09:18 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83k1lzjq0r.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 30 Oct 2018 19:36:04 +0200") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 3 Rules triggered ATR_WMN=0.2, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6407=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6407> : inlines <6948> : streams <1802831> : uri <2741191> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230839 Archived-At: > And I already read that, and hoped for some more details. Should I > give up? As I said, I'm not interested in a docstring that repeats what dolist does; I want it to explain the difference between dolist and pcase-dolist (because that's how pcase-dolist is defined both in terms of design and in terms of implementation). Stefan