From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Future release of emacs-26 Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 17:03:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871s1ent89.fsf@gmail.com> <87pnovlr5z.fsf@gmail.com> <83k1f3k3rm.fsf@gnu.org> <87y339g9g7.fsf_-_@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="40389"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 14 23:07:20 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hQedr-000ANK-07 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 23:07:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54192 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQedp-00058T-TW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:07:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40487) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQeaG-0003T8-BI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:03:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQeaF-0007yj-Ah for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:03:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=59746 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQeaF-0007xZ-3s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:03:35 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hQeaC-00062c-Aw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 23:03:32 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:64rO5Phu8lVCSGp6WGLT3limCQg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236520 Archived-At: > The signature checking has never worked anyway, though. Maybe not for you, but it's supposed to work, and AFAIK it works for many people. > Will having a newer > signature make a difference? If I rename my .emacs.d/ and run "emacs" > (master), > then "M-x package-list", I get this: > > Failed to verify signature archive-contents.sig: > Bad signature from 474F05837FBDEF9B GNU ELPA Signing Agent (2014) < > elpasign@elpa.gnu.org> > Command output: > gpg: Signature made 05/14/19 10:10:03 GMT Summer Time > gpg: using DSA key CA442C00F91774F17F59D9B0474F05837FBDEF9B > gpg: BAD signature from "GNU ELPA Signing Agent (2014) < > elpasign@elpa.gnu.org>" [unknown] > > This is on Windows, with gpg 2.2.11 on the path. Sounds like a bug. Could you report it as such, so we can track it (and hopefully fix it for 26.3)? Stefan