From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A whole lotta auto-saving going Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 10:21:29 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8735zdyly0.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27676"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Aaron Jensen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 16:23:04 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kxX7u-00072a-RZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 16:23:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35310 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxX7t-00026u-QE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 10:23:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41246) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxX6V-0000Ob-GP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 10:21:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:65077) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxX6T-0000S7-BG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 10:21:34 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C1D3D100240; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 10:21:31 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5BA4210005D; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 10:21:30 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1610032890; bh=eb8eJz+fjCVSmNk8XyCWTrhfKEdwH50cxH2c46WRxu0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZFRZYnKcDIvDCilA0NNjTbrsK+GI4N+ieoI2Rh0SO1EP9z8TKb+nVCvmjnPSPLIgb yrpNPS77UBVk/kb0UzR9/+nIa79XB+n02BgutPIdXvokk2iQrNP72590C83knUrzYt LtUZByC7hX0vy5ThmmHBPf3gfSHB7setJLaL4i007+PRISb4QUBHReZlIxmUkAWDs+ CrXdlrCavrQi+qB/ilUOqI8x6TOmcrpTOH6w/XbTp6hVsFLWCnXNum1YP6skFUpnMt lxveXWKhjDLZ1Dj6IIKKrgSf4D0JyaXMGTOagxkHQN1n3FFu539fN5nIEb4eqMWBf6 reU0UX6QXFqiQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.224.181]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFF91120323; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 10:21:29 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <8735zdyly0.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 07 Jan 2021 13:24:07 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262688 Archived-At: >> - /* FIXME: What's the relationship between forcing auto-save and adding >> - a buffer-switch event? */ >> - record_asynch_buffer_change (); > > Ah, that does seem kinda likely -- Stefan added to the CCs. > > I'm still seeing this issue, but I haven't yet found time to try to > debug it. Instead I've switched auto-saving off in larger buffers (it > somehow seems like it's triggering more in those buffers). I'm afraid I can't see how that code could increase the auto-save frequency. But keep in mind that I never understood how that code can interact with auto-save anyway, Stefan