From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:57:42 -0500 Message-ID: References: <86eeifawx8.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87czxygdl9.fsf@russet.org.uk> <86tur88izp.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <831rec5apu.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1magg4x.fsf@russet.org.uk> <86sg6o6c43.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83o8hb21wk.fsf@gnu.org> <83czxr1zl3.fsf@gnu.org> <835z3j1x0h.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25099"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , phillip.lord@russet.org.uk, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 27 15:58:33 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l4mHB-0006QO-Cv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:58:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52864 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4mHA-00042O-FJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:58:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58914) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4mGT-0003aw-8t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:57:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:32245) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4mGQ-0005cS-Ty; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:57:48 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6F720101F43; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:57:45 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E0F12100229; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:57:43 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1611759463; bh=+V6O0RDR+Lj8RECxRA9l55BZ8suNvQdpvHcfVBGL080=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=fTb0Sjy4Zta5iYb99VYxGxBSD5+iEQ3YoMyryqAp7rGrYypeDSZtm0xxzzfjV5bM9 jSt6yey/UZJgsrWHPcK8OhIhmrtHeqtlj+VKVU4UXMq0UAIyJAwGgvEcN+njOMuk47 X0xmUoW0odEMl+fyxuBxmndfwnwCG4QOgbN56X3v7apeHP7S3tuDAOjHLBq/lRoRxT hfVy+t7N/4e03R/RchMpYd//WFKYHB7otmyDybfGod//xbIeYOXd1XqLY55X2ZxBGp DRjOQuU/P+p5ncGqWCQ/X7qgpgz4Tpc3aBH+NbkgFK6Cls9Wf87UcVBBqeV0xlMTGR gwlcLedsGfJVg== Original-Received: from alfajor (69-196-141-46.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.141.46]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C6EC1202C2; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:57:43 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:52:52 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263508 Archived-At: >>> If elpa.git is not in the frame, then how did elpa/ada-mode wind up in >>> emacs.git? >> Someone put it there manually. > One (moderate) downside of this is those of us who are already subscribed to > elpa-diffs will receive the notification emails for the same commits again > from emacs-diffs. Good point, I had not considered that. It's somewhat minor, but it would definitely annoy me. Stefan