From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] externals/marginalia 94fc7f0: README: Add ELPA badge Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 11:16:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20210530185719.10480.76043@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210530185720.C7394209BF@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <2b8bd070-845e-6b73-3f1c-209c044b1c5d@daniel-mendler.de> <87im2vovq3.fsf@tcd.ie> <581b728a-6e84-ec2d-064f-de202f3fd5cd@daniel-mendler.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17748"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Mendler Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 03 17:17:01 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lop5h-0004Km-0K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 17:17:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49462 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lop5g-0000bS-3L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 11:17:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lop55-0007yU-Er for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 11:16:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:26868) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lop53-00012Z-7f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 11:16:22 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E91001002C7; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 11:16:19 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 45DE21000C9; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 11:16:18 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1622733378; bh=3D1r1G6S6NqNcEAQ75PvyRhxPHTaRaPq4Cm+dWTeLoU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=cgktx6F0MMIA2ZKSvasQoaecLAyAQwcBqrFga9OcnTZunZfLUXoVNoyk2GdFIt604 PfVlZTjMnQdLe2Ayu8FCx4cmHIwazK6yJ2zp20O42p0e3JkrLf41AleEsdZglkyzxw gACe4VoY46MLdtT+jtkep+I8klNtvOTljdt2VlYK6vfdMczm6RuLeMbQSd0qjPJgPz xuHmnU7fsApSOQzQqUJWQASW8GftnmaK9++M/WUWrUSUPpwfGbqgGVgWi2jEKzX+Oa 20g8A/nOASMPTrg7331sGj+Na4fmo5nEr+g1N+semfaQt8BARklEw7DMphheJVPcUp lETzUJ0qB0jhg== Original-Received: from alfajor (69-196-163-239.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.163.239]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFE8D120377; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 11:16:17 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <581b728a-6e84-ec2d-064f-de202f3fd5cd@daniel-mendler.de> (Daniel Mendler's message of "Thu, 3 Jun 2021 16:51:53 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:270349 Archived-At: >> Is there someone here with access to GNU ELPA's Apache configuration >> that would make a similar change? I do have access, but it's been too many years since the last time I played with Apache's config, so I'd welcome some hand-holding. >> If not, where should this request go? > I was about to suggest something along those lines, but it was not clear > to me that "no-cache" is sufficient to disable the aggressive caching. > I assume Stefan can adjust the Apache setting to serve *.svg files with > "no-cache" from the packages directory. Any change we can use something less aggressive than `no-cache`, e.g. indicate that it should be considered stale after, say, 24h? Stefan