From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Has enriched-mode become enriched? Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:05:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87r1g4lzax.fsf@yandex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27562"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Colin Baxter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 13 15:06:32 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m3I7K-0006pM-SD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 15:06:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33922 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m3I7J-0000nL-Q2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:06:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46590) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m3I6G-0008VE-CN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:05:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:64553) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m3I63-0002xL-Eo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:05:23 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C215F10020E; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:05:05 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3B1E010005D; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:05:04 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1626181504; bh=MoGxbfaDMAmLkBAa74LYMU2MeXxMkEP0YP+8q7/rj4k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ciMbOh3l9HbRXBDhhHkO7bZppAKLY1q08VyJcXW7h/5Nj0tGVKCN/i3JT0IbRNmp1 3z0kFq7y8P6CpDuXTEKw6C5py+YKtCYuXS4M6lmWXt8nR+g32MzEzLiTRT34J5V9OF rktR8wSHpNW+WheZVBEfMw/B5wOvCsnJFecfHNfVq3vzQ6Fg2f6tkMyqkXz+C82e+v BqHZ1YBQjzIKI1Y4aXgCqu4+VK1yG1fHyi7prFYP7yj6PW+UJlvWbEke5UjRVCDlO3 iuic9QhiMa1xn+IwhTgNljgLULMEg3511eTYIOcoodRnIJk7zPVkRXRDyOykqDsAa0 HNC5uZ9+fORXw== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.29.138]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 074C31205E6; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:05:04 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87r1g4lzax.fsf@yandex.com> (Colin Baxter's message of "Mon, 12 Jul 2021 09:19:18 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:271197 Archived-At: > I noticed a couple of changes in enriched-mode exhibited by the latest > emacs, which are not present in emacs-27.2. > > 1. It used to be the case that I could set a local variable as > > #+begin_src elisp > # Local Variables: > # mode: enriched-mode > # End: > #+end_src > > Now the addition of mode after the hyphen gives a File local-variables > error: (void-function enriched-mode-mode). I just tried it with Debian's 27.1 and it doesn't work either. AFAIK it's always been the case that the `mode:` thingy needs to have the major mode spelled without the `-mode` trailer (this is important for security reasons, since it would otherwise make it possible to call any function). > I now have to use > > #+begin_src elisp > # Local Variables: > # mode: enriched > # End: > #+end_src That's the normal form. Not sure how/why the other one worked for you in the past. > It used to be the case that > > #+begin_src elisp > (add-hook 'text-mode-hook > (lambda () > (flyspell-mode))) > #+end_src I think this will depend on the file name: enriched mode is a *minor* mode, so whether it gets put in `text-mode` or some other mode will depend on the file's name. > I am wondering if these changes are intended. I think you need to investigate on your side to make sure where those changes come from because I don't think they come from Emacs-27 vs Emacs-28 (or if they do, I don't think they come from changes in `enriched-mode`). Stefan