From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] externals/elisp-benchmarks 7467bf994e: Add EIEIO benchmark Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:51:29 -0500 Message-ID: References: <164426867203.8002.1171815336107702126@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220207211752.E4BECC0DA39@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30571"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 10 17:12:21 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nIC3R-0007hW-Pf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:12:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37990 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nIC3Q-0000KE-IC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:12:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50594) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nI9rQ-0000aD-T7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:51:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:49621) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nI9rJ-000316-UV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:51:45 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F2ACF100211; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:51:32 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1E77710009E; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:51:32 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1644501092; bh=/L5SbHKeKcEsCI/9qJn07KP9+kVbhdLAxZKT6CQ265A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=OoM2cY7Zjvj3vEz1BPDRv8Of78RHb6fm9beiBwBPl2sGIlJUJw7bjC3IBi2sUcLd8 AqZEyaCF2f5YeDYWzNhObPMHzBU+CSuydVb9/NtU1Ky7bEoEqQbHKWfpe9fLLpB8Mm qke+Q67cEi3PbiDO8KhxlFHMmyrihBEpSM1RxH5GMWkkHS3oMBOQiY8llwoN+tsYve 3qSzFaoBa4lak+Rw80AltOd2IvIW1KBfepynbBsuTaiRJ8IjcIx8qFWaMo3iwf3rN5 R3KqCIQmZ4fDOzt69LKLOEtyc0rj/2AEaDKhbC5GAYk416/tsZqGKlTs2Xxb+BnDK3 5ZJcW/zNVAh2g== Original-Received: from pastel (76-10-138-212.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.138.212]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6C161208A1; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:51:31 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Andrea Corallo's message of "Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:29:10 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:286138 Archived-At: > Will `elb-fibn-tc-entry' ever be called? Yes, the functions of the form `elb-*-entry` are the benchmarks, so a single file can provide several benchmarks (this was already used with `pack-unpack.el`). The only real change w.r.t `fibn*` was the number of iterations which has been made equal between the various alternative implementations so they can be directly compared to see the cost of using `named-let` or recursion over `while/cl-loop`. Stefan