From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master f117b5df4d: Add new functions eol and bol Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 12:49:08 -0400 Message-ID: References: <166091536530.20326.14174671546998200051@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220819132245.AE2BBC0088A@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87a680v004.fsf@gnus.org> <6bccc5f6-69de-7402-085b-e5f1c84a0592@yandex.ru> <87o7wfqshr.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8046"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Dmitry Gutov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 20 18:50:30 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oPRg5-0001tH-1R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 18:50:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46330 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oPRg4-0008Ni-0f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 12:50:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56054) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oPRes-000756-1h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 12:49:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:20461) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oPRep-00069H-Nb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 12:49:12 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E622C100142; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 12:49:10 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 960641000FF; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 12:49:09 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1661014149; bh=mDA/UctuY6Lj+Ox4RV/9lPbKe8qp3HDZe02x8ftvkkQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=mrWVcqkFpQNqgM1632qffoZzZgFgzsg0B0myxTvku/GaQTUY0s83Xy2Fh2igLUsVp yAY+8P3x9lHNhky1CQT2Lp3iq4/0nkPwIyAE5J5iwtPKPOUne1YM3VC5n3lMQ2p1h3 ehKooszFui2OMoE4Srk+o2o+DPlf4lk2rHwkPt5ibQEymrjNEo02ysZUGeRM6I5G9k 4lYxKI3PI8Q5VcxkXgaVnBbEZhYmlDbLZbXir56E9M1iDzCLiFaZNqKhd3mfjxRrCq KMCg29esW1yqZQCbbXd/q8YLEDt1j+NxFFnW8wEWfO8N8IMdFnmy+FBlo0SwF0QJh7 EW9OLJog03sXg== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.195.111]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7292D120211; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 12:49:09 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87o7wfqshr.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 20 Aug 2022 09:33:20 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:293672 Archived-At: > Anyway, back to the naming issue -- `pos-eol' would also be short and > snappy... or `eol-pos'? Hm. I like using the `pos-` prefix. No opinion on the use of `at-` in there. Stefan