From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages! Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 15:57:49 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87r0y6ug9z.fsf@disroot.org> <87y1sct2hp.fsf@posteo.net> <87k03vf5m8.fsf@disroot.org> <87edu2narn.fsf@posteo.net> <8735aieqtr.fsf@disroot.org> <87cz9mlq3o.fsf@posteo.net> <875yfdd5ad.fsf@disroot.org> <87wn7hh438.fsf@posteo.net> <87sfi5h3ne.fsf@posteo.net> <874julpgi4.fsf@disroot.org> <87v8n04o4b.fsf@posteo.net> <87cz98nxah.fsf@disroot.org> <87sfi2vqxe.fsf@disroot.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22182"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Philip Kaludercic , Emacs Developer List To: Akib Azmain Turja Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 28 21:58:29 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ozlCv-0005Yp-D8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 21:58:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ozlCP-0008Az-93; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 15:57:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ozlCO-00089u-7Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 15:57:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ozlCM-0007f5-KD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 15:57:55 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 54626804C0; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 15:57:52 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EA4998005E; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 15:57:50 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1669669071; bh=zPWnLhYLXJdydmU3OhZSDNdzuumYDhOSs6zS74tqVKo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=mXEjgR37E7u4Hm+i0uSrWyEZFfyfYpdFB1NY15lPyP64j3fg9ZZ63v5CsYmcvfQHl q8f5JLkaQNyS38xI+MGu7Lw+Z7PCu3HEsWzZ5CvErZ6m9xc+6AoxwcAKtiDQQAqhds C/76J/L2twpUIGEOmIyBlUo4jiuuLYyTx81ire/J3ArSsvcvbTk5wEWj8aMqBk/A/P Vw/FRVX1jsoHjw83dlXQS98NWHeixyy1xtul64QSsO7bzI+tdTRFqbpysSLeF8OMeq RuklFHbV8ubYBX/MoYmu0l+YLSRrTEKgyQaOrKYLsiaYnkfaBZngR9z1q3Mx2EDrTR Z7gp7DwFmjFeQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.44.229.252]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7D5B120776; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 15:57:50 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87sfi2vqxe.fsf@disroot.org> (Akib Azmain Turja's message of "Tue, 29 Nov 2022 01:07:25 +0600") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:300688 Archived-At: >> Somehow I prefer to use one setq for each variable. Is setting multiple >> at once faster? Benchmarking with "benchmark"... Yes, about 1.5 times. No, the generated byte-code should be identical. If you see a difference it's probably because you tested interpreted code. Stefan