From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Declaring Lisp function types Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:44:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6713"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Kangas , Adam Porter , Arthur Miller To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 26 14:46:31 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rp78I-0001WU-Ra for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:46:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rp76t-0008FR-6p; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:45:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rp76l-00086H-6l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:44:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rp76E-0006NU-MT; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:44:54 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A243280AD9; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:44:03 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1711460642; bh=LRB78QmwDhM9ln2Ah+3cfkGWJhBD0suNzepAtirtzoA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=mDF9ku+WLXtNW5r4sE2N0KznCl8sxNzZ4+j1IDfz7cKoMfjQV48MRRTAKZkf3OSdK AekksFg4cjiFIAuYZBsVasaSvv8yG95y+UndmliACeFgS9oIWCZFH1ow96gW89h3fr TcUPVXYYqc03M2/HCLURCTFC3TyyQrkUzKFmTYkQiPs1aaNogLJ0FH2byGkcUfxbJR S2FQ7ae3oml0tAyP5rgcs247Lu+SddHLkOhjefyrjM0Tv836fGSDAPOvo8pRQwVDVK Dq/TGKOGMHbhxedSqlPsffft2TpU37XDGsvyWzzlHSp0qWcmJIW+wVQ0SRCPvG6tyV MD+ow710cM3nQ== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 963EF8089D; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:44:02 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.199.112]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E69A120287; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:44:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Andrea Corallo's message of "Tue, 26 Mar 2024 06:13:26 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:317302 Archived-At: > Stefan suggested we go for 2 as it's more verbose (and this should > discourage users at using it too much). Side note: the main reason I'm in favor of 2 is because it's simpler and cleaner. The "more verbose" is just a kind of side-benefit to try and reassure those who are afraid of annotations becoming the norm. Stefan