From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Patch for sql.el Date: 06 May 2004 18:41:37 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20040506223012.96520.qmail@web60305.mail.yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1083884718 23561 80.91.224.253 (6 May 2004 23:05:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 23:05:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri May 07 01:05:09 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BLrvQ-0001fG-00 for ; Fri, 07 May 2004 01:05:08 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BLrvQ-0003ov-00 for ; Fri, 07 May 2004 01:05:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BLrbh-0007Bv-J6 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 06 May 2004 18:44:45 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BLra8-0006f5-BV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2004 18:43:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BLrZb-0006VD-2b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2004 18:43:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BLrYh-0006Ei-UC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2004 18:41:39 -0400 Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C61621192; Thu, 6 May 2004 18:41:37 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7A1ED8C6AE; Thu, 6 May 2004 18:41:37 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Michael Mauger In-Reply-To: <20040506223012.96520.qmail@web60305.mail.yahoo.com> Original-Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-1.524, requis 5, BAYES_01 -1.52) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:22886 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:22886 > (defun font-lock-add-syntax (syntax-alist) > (defun font-lock-remove-syntax (syntax-alist) [..] > Or are we pushing the feature freeze...? Not only that, but I feel it's just adding ad-hoc cruft above ad-hoc cruft. Is there any particular reason why you don't merge all those submodes and simply handle a language that's a superset of all? Basically accept @ # $ as symbol components, and accept all the keywords of all the known servers... That should simplify your code. Stefan