From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gnus makes emacs lose response Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:10:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1157861450 2804 80.91.229.2 (10 Sep 2006 04:10:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 04:10:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , Leon , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 10 06:10:48 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GMGeb-0005nE-PG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 06:10:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GMGeb-0007dm-AC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:10:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GMGeP-0007aq-Hn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:10:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GMGeN-0007Y0-PW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:10:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GMGeN-0007Xo-Mq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:10:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.34] (helo=tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GMGfL-00065n-GW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:11:31 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([70.55.80.224]) by tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060910041030.DGUR29052.tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net@localhost>; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:10:30 -0400 Original-Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8052E8B15; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:10:30 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: (Kim F. Storm's message of "Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:33:24 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59614 Archived-At: > (gdb) p Qnil > $1 = 137562313 > (gdb) p Vquit_flag > $2 = 137562313 > (gdb) p immediate_quit > $3 = 0 > (gdb) p Vinhibit_quit > $4 = 137562361 So inhibit-quit is non-nil, so shouldn't my patch have caught this? What does the xbacktrace look like? Stefan