From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Ediff regression Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:40:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <9436.1181807325@cs.sunysb.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181832019 12130 80.91.229.12 (14 Jun 2007 14:40:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 14 16:40:17 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HyqUe-0004pI-5Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:40:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HyqUd-00058R-PH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:40:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HyqUa-00058D-7j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:40:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HyqUW-00057c-SF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:40:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HyqUW-00057Z-Lz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:40:04 -0400 Original-Received: from bc.sympatico.ca ([209.226.175.184] helo=tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HyqUW-0002B2-7c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:40:04 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([70.55.143.156]) by tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20070614144003.KSZV875.tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net@pastel.home> for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0C9E27F84; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:40:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <9436.1181807325@cs.sunysb.edu> (Michael Kifer's message of "Thu\, 14 Jun 2007 03\:48\:45 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72861 Archived-At: > Sorry, I did not touch diff-mode.el intentionally. I see that the log > points the finger in my direction, but I do not know how it happened. :-( > The expression to which you changed diff-font-lock-keywords is similar to > one in ediff, but I do not know if it is what you wanted in > diff-mode.el. It seems ok, but if you are not sure then it is better to > revert to version 1.100. Sorry for the mixup. You changed "\\S-" into "[^\t]" which was obviously meant to be "[^ \t]". So I fixed the obvious. I don't have much preference between the two, so I left "[^ \t]" there. Maybe if you could say why you preferred "[^ \t]" over "\\S-" in ediff, I can make up a good reason to do the same change in diff-mode.el ;-)? Stefan