From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Printing Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:52:33 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5f0660120903280331y780c80b7i57a8115dc4b029eb@mail.gmail.com> <5f0660120903281352v5d7ab83cy44fcff3cbf4581cb@mail.gmail.com> <87ljqnkvn9.fsf@jehiel.elehack.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1238547368 1279 80.91.229.12 (1 Apr 2009 00:56:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 00:56:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael@elehack.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 01 02:57:26 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Looic-0005AU-1s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:54:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43643 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LoohE-0005Rf-Ev for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:52:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LoohA-0005RU-JC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:52:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Looh6-0005R1-4g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:52:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35713 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Looh6-0005Qy-0A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:52:40 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:39330 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Looh1-0001n6-4X; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:52:35 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqgEABdX0klFxIfy/2dsb2JhbACBU8xyg3oGhH8 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.39,304,1235970000"; d="scan'208";a="36020324" Original-Received: from 69-196-135-242.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.135.242]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 31 Mar 2009 20:52:33 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9F8917057A; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:52:33 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:15:41 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109955 Archived-At: > I hope you are not saying that ps-print machinery is the only way > Emacs will be able to print in the future, i.e. rely on PostScript > support of the OS infrastructure. Yes, that's what I'm saying. > Because if you do, the history of that until today should tell us this > is not necessarily a good idea. What other way to print are you thinking of? Stefan