From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: I can see invisible characters Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:32:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4A146CE3.6060306@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1242865870 4947 80.91.229.12 (21 May 2009 00:31:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 00:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: grischka Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 21 02:31:03 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M6wBY-00047E-V0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 May 2009 02:31:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58793 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M6wBY-0003UV-FG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 May 2009 20:31:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M6wBU-0003UG-G2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2009 20:30:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M6wBP-0003U2-5h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2009 20:30:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39839 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M6wBO-0003Ty-Uv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2009 20:30:50 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:11855 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M6wBO-0003Ix-Lx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2009 20:30:50 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AugEAOk9FEpMCovv/2dsb2JhbACBT8wThAgFhXU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,224,1241409600"; d="scan'208";a="38850381" Original-Received: from 76-10-139-239.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.139.239]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 20 May 2009 20:30:49 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id F3D247F29; Wed, 20 May 2009 20:32:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4A146CE3.6060306@gmx.de> (grischka's message of "Wed, 20 May 2009 22:49:39 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:111008 Archived-At: >> In your case, the property is not front-sticky, so point can be at >> beginning of the intangible span, i.e. at BOB. > But note that even both "front sticky" and "intangible" set on > the topmost area don't prevent point from going to BOB. If the span is rear-sticky as well, that's perfectly normal, I think. If the span is rear-nonsticky, I guess this may also be the case and would then be a BOB exception. Stefan