From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Loading" Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:28:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87obrzo8qy.fsf@gmx.de> <87r4wv715s.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1331735307 8087 80.91.229.3 (14 Mar 2012 14:28:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 14 15:28:26 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S7pBc-0000t9-UH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:28:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60089 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7pBc-0002Zz-3i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:28:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43790) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7pBV-0002Z1-8d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7pBM-00067I-UU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:28:12 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:49618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7pBM-00067A-Qc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:28:04 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicFAKU/KE9soXdS/2dsb2JhbACBX5x7eYhwnhmGGQSbGYQJ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,1,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="167968676" Original-Received: from 108-161-119-82.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([108.161.119.82]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 14 Mar 2012 10:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B9C2FAE2B3; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:28:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87r4wv715s.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:38:39 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149044 Archived-At: >> Why mode-line-remote rather than mode-line-process? > I'm saving a file. mode-line-remote ("@") tells me about the status of > this file, "being remote". Saving the file has nothing to do with any > running process, from the user's pov. So I believe it is the natural > place to indicate. To me mode-line-process is the natural place (within the mode-line) to put things that say "not quite done yet". Stefan