From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Replacing the `elpa' branch Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:31:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361025089 29484 80.91.229.3 (16 Feb 2013 14:31:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:31:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 16 15:31:51 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U6inv-0004Qn-6b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 15:31:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47163 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6inb-0004kL-E8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:31:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49215) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6inX-0004kE-5W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:31:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6inW-0006hb-6D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:31:27 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:50184) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6inW-0006hO-2W; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:31:26 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At0KABK/CFFFxKjI/2dsb2JhbABEvg0EAnsXc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDiGGcGYFegxU X-IPAS-Result: At0KABK/CFFFxKjI/2dsb2JhbABEvg0EAnsXc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDiGGcGYFegxU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="1564442" Original-Received: from 69-196-168-200.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.168.200]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 16 Feb 2013 09:31:24 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C981B6F8CE; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:31:24 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:06:33 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157080 Archived-At: > In the mean time, is it possible to recreate the elpa Bzr branch > based on what is in the git repository? Or would that trigger the same > bug again? It would trigger the same problem, indeed. The thing that triggers the bug is the exact thing we want. Stefan