unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord)
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Calling Lisp from undo.c's record_* functions
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 08:46:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwv7flg4u73.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h9kkbz6k.fsf@russet.org.uk> (Phillip Lord's message of "Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:14:27 +0000")

>>> Debugging uncovered the following sequence of calls:
>>> . bottom line: the gap was shrunk behind the back of
>>> insert_from_string_1, which totally doesn't expect that, and
>>> proceeds doing silly things, like setting the gap size to a large
>>> negative value, and from there we are on a certain and very short
>>> path to a crash
>> Duh!
>>> My dilemma is: how to fix this cleanly and correctly?
>> Not sure what's the best solution, but the precise moment when
>> run_undoable_change is executed is not terribly important, so if we
>> could just move it to either before or after the "critical section",
>> then that would be a good solution.
> I'm not sure how I would identify the "critical section".

The "critical section" is the span of code during which the buffer is
"being worked on" by the insertion function, so during this time, the
buffer shouldn't be modified by anyone else in any way: no Elisp code
should be run, no GC should take place.

> At one point, this function call was actually a hook
> (after-undoable-change-hook). Would this solve the problem?

Nope, makes no difference.


        Stefan



  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-17 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-16 16:46 Calling Lisp from undo.c's record_* functions Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-16 21:51 ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-16 22:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-17 12:14   ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-17 13:46     ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2015-11-17 14:42       ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-17 15:40         ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-17 16:24           ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-17 16:49             ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-17 17:05               ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-17 17:34                 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-17 18:00                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-17 19:09                     ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-17 19:22                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-17 21:05                     ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-17 21:02               ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-18  2:55                 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-18 12:26                   ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-17 16:35         ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-17 20:52           ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-18  3:38             ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-18  9:56               ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-18 10:49                 ` David Kastrup
2015-11-18 17:30                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-17 16:40     ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-17 16:51       ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-17 19:44         ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-17 21:35           ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-18  2:52           ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-18  3:49             ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-18 12:31               ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-18 17:49                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-19  1:49                   ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-19 10:16                   ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-19 15:53                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-19 17:49                       ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-19 17:58                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-19 18:17                           ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-22 21:44                       ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-22 22:41                         ` John Wiegley
2015-11-23 17:29                           ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-23  3:37                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-23 17:28                           ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-25 17:43                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-25 22:51                               ` Richard Stallman
2015-11-26 10:27                               ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-17 21:13       ` Phillip Lord

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=jwv7flg4u73.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
    --to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=phillip.lord@russet.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).