unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
To: John Wiegley <johnw@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Cc: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 9dcf599: Amend parse-partial-sexp correctly to handle two character comment delimiters
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 11:30:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwv7fgxyxqg.fsf-monnier+emacsdiffs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160320144018.GC3603@acm.fritz.box> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:40:18 +0000")

What he says,


        Stefan


>>>>> "Alan" == Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:

> Hello, John.
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 09:47:58AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> What was John's opinion on reusing nth 5?


>> Stefan

> Yes John, what is your opinion on reusing element 5 of the parser state?

> Background:

> The previous edition of `parse-partial-sexp' returned a ten-element list
> which could be used for continuing that parse.  Unfortunately, this list
> was incomplete, leading to errors when the parse had stopped in the
> middle of a two-character comment delimiter.  This is bug #23019.

> My patch, created with Stefan's help, has solved this bug, partly by
> adding another element onto the parser state.  But this new element
> leaves element 5 ("t when just after an escape character") redundant.

> Stefan is in favour of reusing position 5 for this new element, rather
> than adding it at the end of the state (which has just been done).  I am
> against this, though not strongly.  It might have some effects on
> existing code, though this is not particularly likely.

> What do you say?

> -- 
> Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).



>> >>>>> "Alan" == Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:

>> > branch: master
>> > commit 9dcf5998935c8aaa846d7585b81f0dcfe1935b3d
>> > Author: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
>> > Commit: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>

>> >     Amend parse-partial-sexp correctly to handle two character comment delimiters
    
>> >     Do this by adding a new field to the parser state: the syntax of the last
>> >     character scanned, should that be the first char of a (potential) two char
>> >     construct, nil otherwise.
>> >     This should make the parser state complete.
>> >     Also document element 9 of the parser state.  Also refactor the code a bit.
    
>> >     * src/syntax.c (struct lisp_parse_state): Add a new field.
>> >     (SYNTAX_FLAGS_COMSTARTEND_FIRST): New function.
>> >     (internalize_parse_state): New function, extracted from scan_sexps_forward.
>> >     (back_comment): Call internalize_parse_state.
>> >     (forw_comment): Return the syntax of the last character scanned to the caller
>> >     when that character might be the first of a two character construct.
>> >     (Fforward_comment, scan_lists): New dummy variables, passed to forw_comment.
>> >     (scan_sexps_forward): Remove a redundant state parameter.  Access all `state'
>> >     information via the address parameter `state'.  Remove the code which converts
>> >     from external to internal form of `state'.  Access buffer contents only from
>> >     `from' onwards.  Reformulate code at the top of the main loop correctly to
>> >     recognize comment openers when starting in the middle of one.  Call
>> >     forw_comment with extra argument (for return of syntax value of possible first
>> >     char of a two char construct).
>> >     (Fparse_partial_sexp): Document elements 9, 10 of the parser state in the
>> >     doc string.  Clarify the doc string in general.  Call
>> >     internalize_parse_state.  Take account of the new elements when consing up the
>> >     output parser state.
    
>> >     * doc/lispref/syntax.texi: (Parser State): Document element 9 and the new
>> >     element 10.  Minor wording corrections (remove reference to "trivial
>> >     cases").
>> >     (Low Level Parsing): Minor corrections.
    
>> >     * etc/NEWS: Note new element 10, and documentation of element 9 of parser
>> >     state.



      reply	other threads:[~2016-03-20 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20160320132125.5713.70103@vcs.savannah.gnu.org>
     [not found] ` <E1ahdIL-0001Ul-Uz@vcs.savannah.gnu.org>
2016-03-20 13:47   ` [Emacs-diffs] master 9dcf599: Amend parse-partial-sexp correctly to handle two character comment delimiters Stefan Monnier
2016-03-20 14:22     ` Alan Mackenzie
2016-03-20 14:40     ` Alan Mackenzie
2016-03-20 15:30       ` Stefan Monnier [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=jwv7fgxyxqg.fsf-monnier+emacsdiffs@gnu.org \
    --to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    --cc=acm@muc.de \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=johnw@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).