From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: When should ralloc.c be used? Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:43:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87twe6sx2g.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87eg51ng4r.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <87k2djwumn.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83h98nidvd.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg3rvtsf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83k2dihpm9.fsf@gnu.org> <8760p2wzgj.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <838ttyhhzu.fsf@gnu.org> <871szqwu51.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <831szqhbc2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1itt79z.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <7baa18d4-2b09-caa8-005e-29008a383ad1@cs.ucla.edu> <83mvhwrgd5.fsf@gnu.org> <8539f38f-9a11-44c3-4de7-bb974c96206c@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477165581 17046 195.159.176.226 (22 Oct 2016 19:46:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 19:46:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 22 21:46:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1by2Es-0001GM-C3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 21:45:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38505 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1by2Eu-0003jQ-P6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:45:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55281) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1by2EN-0003jA-1C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:45:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1by2EJ-0003GB-Vl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:45:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=52238 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1by2EJ-0003FE-PT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:45:19 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1by2E4-0003wO-8Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 21:45:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 8 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:GYDVzedt5QUY7Skt44CVqRhsV+0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208603 Archived-At: >> Having it creep back into GNU/Linux is really a bad regression, IMO. > I don't like it either, but would rather work on redoing the build process > so that we can use the native malloc on all hosts. But that doesn't explain why we'd need to use ralloc in the mean time. Stefan