From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Improving GNU ELPA Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:26:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87r2xg2wra.fsf@bernoul.li> <87pod02swk.fsf@bernoul.li> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1500316029 6674 195.159.176.226 (17 Jul 2017 18:27:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:27:09 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jonas Bernoulli Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 17 20:27:05 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dXAjZ-0001Wq-1W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 20:27:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51913 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXAje-0000qD-IM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:27:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXAhp-0008Uq-DX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:25:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXAhm-0000K3-PD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:25:17 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:33382) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXAhm-0000Jr-JZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:25:14 -0400 Original-Received: from lechazo.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id v6HIP7kp002728; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:25:08 -0400 Original-Received: by lechazo.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 327B76EFD6; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:26:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87pod02swk.fsf@bernoul.li> (Jonas Bernoulli's message of "Sun, 16 Jul 2017 19:28:11 +0200") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 3 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.1, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6073=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6073> : inlines <5978> : streams <1754609> : uri <2464774> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216792 Archived-At: > I was somehow under the impression that "subtree" packages were > preferred, and "external" packages only recommended for big packages > and maintainers who refused to use the subtree approach. It's up to the package's maintainer to decide. Stefan