From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 7cfe2dc: In edebug in GUIs, move focus to the selected frame. Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:07:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20181019175416.10874.88992@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20181019175418.27D6920407@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20181019184916.GA6639@ACM> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1539975954 28584 195.159.176.226 (19 Oct 2018 19:05:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 19:05:54 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 19 21:05:50 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDa5l-0007LK-PN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:05:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52266 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDa7s-00016C-BV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:08:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57551) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDa7h-00014J-AV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:07:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDa7c-00022j-Dg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:07:49 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:58939) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDa7c-00021K-8t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:07:44 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id w9JJ7gh3023830; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:07:42 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 75241AE152; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:07:42 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20181019184916.GA6639@ACM> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Fri, 19 Oct 2018 18:49:17 +0000") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6399=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6399> : inlines <6936> : streams <1801786> : uri <2733891> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230505 Archived-At: > I thought about that, but in the end decided that could be a bit heavy > for when information is only being displayed, i.e. in > edebug-trace-display. If the intention is only to display the code shouldn't use pop-to-buffer but display-buffer. > This bit of the code surely originates from the time before frames were > implemented. [ Probably, but since most Emacs users don't actually make use of multiple frames, a lot of code written much more recently also suffers from the same kinds of "outdated" assumptions. ] Stefan