From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: scratch/accurate-warning-pos: Solid progress: the branch now bootstraps. Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 15:08:52 -0500 Message-ID: <jwv7eh0kjnu.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <20181117124534.GA8831@ACM> <83muq7u9rk.fsf@gnu.org> <20181123130904.GA2916@ACM> <m2sgzpxuru.fsf@aurox.ch> <20181125143125.GA27152@ACM> <jwvlg5hruvn.fsf-monnier+INBOX@gnu.org> <20181125173528.GD27152@ACM> <jwv4lc5koo0.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <20181125195402.GJ27152@ACM> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1543177192 15827 195.159.176.226 (25 Nov 2018 20:19:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 20:19:52 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, eliz@gnu.org, "Charles A. Roelli" <charles@aurox.ch>, cpitclaudel@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 25 21:19:48 2018 Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>) id 1gR0sd-0003xk-5V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 21:19:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32867 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>) id 1gR0uj-0004ye-7t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 15:21:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59675) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1gR0u1-0004yZ-Qh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 15:21:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1gR0tw-0007x9-UR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 15:21:13 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:41744) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1gR0tw-0007x4-QD; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 15:21:08 -0500 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id wAPKL4bW027782; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 15:21:04 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8EA88AE5E8; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 15:08:52 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20181125195402.GJ27152@ACM> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Sun, 25 Nov 2018 19:54:02 +0000") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 3 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.1, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6425=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6425> : inlines <6970> : streams <1805320> : uri <2755597> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:231370 Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/231370> >> That would significantly increase the impact in terms of code-size and >> CPU time (could explain why you see 8% slowdown which is more expansive >> than my patch which turns EQ into EQL). > Would it? Yes: I think NILP is much more frequent than EQ. Stefan