From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bloat in the Emacs Windows package Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 16:20:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87mukocyze.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83v9zceb3n.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvev1epx.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83v9zbcesn.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7gnypsx.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83sguecxth.fsf@gnu.org> <87r29t22pk.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87ef5t9h18.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87ftq47mq6.fsf@russet.org.uk> <877ebf8g8v.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83k1f8nibt.fsf@gnu.org> <83ef5fmlbo.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="254322"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: =?windows-1252?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Lindqvist , emacs-devel@gnu.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 03 23:13:57 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfV9-0012u5-DI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 23:13:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46893 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMegA-0005qT-KF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 16:21:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43308) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMeg2-0005q9-7Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 16:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMeg1-0003f2-9a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 16:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.201]:59472) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMeg1-0003di-1u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 16:21:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (mail01.iro.umontreal.ca [127.0.0.1]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569B08865D01 for ; Fri, 3 May 2019 16:21:00 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; h=content-type:content-type:mime-version:user-agent:in-reply-to :date:date:references:message-id:subject:subject:to:from:from; s=dkim; t=1556914859; x=1557778860; bh=5htJUI8vXB2K2cxJTinXPRv2 gi/6pjCTtwLAIqEONeg=; b=d4XM1IdgHhSBvJo/GPu0gi5SarzzJ5Xg/wsKf9u5 D5+UMF7S2AImnMIDzquHS0j0u28aoYZ5RABD++1S19YeTUwy49vOA8MDyUP8gkDZ e7EuQD0AtcPot5VI4ac1D7L7PXNGQxMn8CytN0gDQidhtRCPvcNYkHLlbWf1ASZ5 D4R73UZyrMjYYyR9nV2GDzWII3V5XrTixhGavjP6IremaN8aIjmxeO2VbNT52ULE E7YYn3/uE0FwZjCpCnGzyXAegfc2o1ZGUuBsly0PnlocpUmUkJ8hzSAw4RU2QQCQ o+WxMwnxsvjlXMTBODHwtnws6KuUJDeBPAePk0mHaH0WMw== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at iro.umontreal.ca Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (mail01.iro.umontreal.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5xWjxkWa7mNG for ; Fri, 3 May 2019 16:20:59 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from alfajor (modemcable157.163-203-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.203.163.157]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 770478865CEB; Fri, 3 May 2019 16:20:58 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83ef5fmlbo.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 03 May 2019 21:42:19 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.201 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236107 Archived-At: >> Wouldn't it be more efficient if each user had their own .pdmp file? >> For example, I never use gnus but I use markdown-mode and erc >> all the time so, for me, it would be better if the latter two packages were >> part of the dump image but not the former. Gnus is not part of the pdmp file: the normal pdmp file only includes those packages which we think will be used by a majority of sessions. Stefan