From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 17:16:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83pnohbhny.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhn6zkgf.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="146589"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 28 23:17:04 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hVjSx-000c0v-T3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 23:17:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42864 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVjSw-0000KU-TO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 17:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34552) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVjSp-0000K9-LE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 17:16:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVjSo-0008WB-RK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 17:16:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=51662 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVjSo-0008VK-KP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 17:16:54 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hVjSm-000bpU-Pn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 23:16:52 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:mZ97RNiEQh+ZcCgDch12wkF0XRs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237130 Archived-At: >> + ;; The implementation for the interpreter is basically trivial. >> + `(with-suppressed-warnings-1 ',warnings (progn ,@body))) > A comment here on why we need both a function and macro would be > useful (or is it possible to have this work with just a macro?) Indeed, for the interpreter the implementation should be like that of with-no-warnings, just dropping the `warnings` argument altogether. Stefan